In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 89-3 and 89-4
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on a Motion to Quash two subpoenas duces tecum. The first was served on movant corporation. The second was served on a corporation now independently owned, but formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of movant corporation. Documents sought in the subpoenas span a six-year period (1983— 89) during which the subsidiary corporation existed first as an unincorporated division of the movant, then later as a wholly-owned incorporated subsidiary, and finally as a separate, independently-owned company. Movant resists production of a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guy v. United Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- X Corp. v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- NCL Corp. v. Lone Star Building Centers (Eastern) Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. NWI-I, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.