Legal Opinion
Guy v. United Healthcare Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 16, 1993No. Civ. A. 2:92-CV-397PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff brings this diversity action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) asserting various state law claims against defendant. This matter is now before the Court on plaintiffs motion to compel discovery.1
In this action, plaintiff generally seeks a finder’s fee for allegedly facilitating the acquisition by defendant United Healthcare Corporation [“UHC”] of Physicians Healthcare Plan Corporation [“PHP”]. PHP is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent UHC. Plaintiff seeks numerous documents that relate to UHC’s acquisition of PHP, and UHC claims…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Great Plains Mutual Insurance v. Mutual Reinsurance BureauDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Perfection Corp. v. Travelers Casualty & SuretyOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State ex rel. Nix v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.