Reynolds v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge
Plaintiff claims that under section 3 of the Act of January 12,1923, 42 Stat. 1130, when that section is interpreted in the light of the entire act and in the light of other relevant statutes, he was and is entitled to additional retired pay of $1,500 per annum inasmuch as that section provided that when a commissioned officer of the Coast Guard who has had forty years’ service shall retire he shall be placed on the retired list with the rank and retired pay of one grade above that actually held by him at the time of retirement. Plaintiff insists that this was a special provision for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Colorado Anthracite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. LandramSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Skeeles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Shanley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Covell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.