Legal Opinion

Price v. Bartkowiak

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1989No. 88 Civ. 2396 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Andrzej Bartkowiak (“Bart-kowiak”) and Aileen Getty Wilding (“Wild-ing”) move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment on their counterclaim and dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs Griffith B. Price Jr. and Maria Helena Price (“the Prices”) cross move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, the Prices’ motion for summary judgment is granted.

The Parties

The Prices are citizens of the District of Columbia. From March of 1980 until December 31, 1987 they were the record owners of residential real property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Slatt v. SlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. LelakisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Chiquita Intern. Ltd. v. LIVERPOOL AND LONDON SS PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. North Houston International, L.L.C. v. PW Real Estate Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API