Legal Opinion

Dart Manufacturing Co. v. Carr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 7, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Franklin C. Platt, Judge. Garnishment proceedings to hold the railway company liable as a garnishee in an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant Carr. The trial court held the garnishee liable, and the garnishee appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Garnishment: interstate shipment: gooods in actual transit. In an action commenced by plaintiff against defendant, Carr, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, having a line of railway in Black Hawk County, Iowa, and engaged in interstate commerce, was garnished, ón the theory that it had certain property belonging to the defendant in its possession for transportation, and was therefore subject to garnishment. It appears that, on the day prior to the commencement of the action, the defendant delivered to the railway company at its depot in Waterloo, Black Hawk County,, a certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bates v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Commercial Exchange Bank v. McLeodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. CobbIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. County of Des Moines v. Hinkley & NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Wales v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Webb Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API