Louisville N. R. Co. v. Webb Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The Webb Furniture Company instituted this suit by process of attachment against Mrs. Frank S. Hanna on the ground that the defendant was a nonresident of the state, seeking a recovery of an alleged indebtedness on account of $135.50. There was no personal service on the defendant, and no personal appearance by her, nor was there any actual levy of any property of the defendant, but the attachment writ was executed by service of process of garnishment on the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a common carrier.
The answer of the garnishee (sworn to and uncontroverted) discloses that, as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Bates v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. ChumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Adams v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Boykin v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006