Legal Opinion

Langlois v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 16, 2011No. 11-cv-03472 RMWPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THE STANDARD OF REVIEW

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of disability benefits allegedly owed to plaintiff Joseph H. Langlois, Jr. (“plaintiff’) by his employer, defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“defendant” or “Met-Life”). The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment concerning the standard of review this court should apply in determining whether such denial was proper. For the reasons below, the court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and finds that the denial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tetreault v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. Durham v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Gonzales v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  5. Ingorvaia v. Reliastar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API