Legal Opinion

Ingorvaia v. Reliastar Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 14, 2013No. Case No. 12cv333 DMS (MDD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ESTABLISH ERISA STANDARD OF REVIEW

DANA M. SABRAW, District Judge.

In this action for review of termination of Plaintiffs long term disability benefits, Defendants filed a motion to establish the applicable standard of review under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Defendants argue that an abuse of discretion standard applies. Plaintiff filed an opposition arguing the applicable standard is de novo, and Defendants replied. With leave of Court, Plaintiff filed a sur-reply. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donna Rhea v. Alan Ritchey, Inc Welfare Bnft, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API