Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Today we resolve yet another discovery dispute in this litigation; this one a Motion of Plaintiff, Maia Caplan, for a Protective Order to keep her from “having to undergo additional days of deposition in this case, after defendants concluded their deposition of her on the fourth day having asked all of the questions they then had.” Motion at 1. Ms. Caplan is represented by William H. Ewing. Defendants, David Braverman and the law firm of Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey, contest this Motion, arguing that Ms. Caplan’s deposition had not been completed at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Logansport Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Perry v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Tramm v. Porter Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Deines v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kleppinger v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012