Muskatell v. Queen City Construction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to recover damages to real property. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which-it was concluded that there could be no recovery against the defendant. From the judgment entered dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.
No bill of exceptions or statement of facts has been brought to this court, and the facts, as found by the trial court, will be summarized only in so far as it ap pears to be necessary to present the question here for determination.
The appellant was the owner of a property which abutted upon the west…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Kaler v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Curtis v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Wolten Grocery Co. v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glade v. DietertTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Palin v. General Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Tidewater Construction Corp. v. ManlySupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Simons v. Tri-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.