Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1925No. 19043. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The James Henry Packing plant is situated on the tide flats in the city of Seattle on the west side of Ninth avenue south. One of the buildings is approximately 240 feet square and rests upon 800 piles, and in 1923 it became necessary to raise it four and one-third feet to conform to the newly established grade-on Ninth avenue south. In June the respondents took the contract to make the raise and started work in the first week of that month. The city of Seattle, desirous of changing the grade of Ninth avenue south and filling the street as it was extended over the tide flats, in March, 1923,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Casassa v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kaler v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fonda v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Senske v. Washington Gas & Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Boggess v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Muskatell v. Queen City Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API