Legal Opinion

Doe v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 31, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HORN, Judge.

This is an action for compensation for a vaccine-related injury to petitioners’ child, brought by his parents John Doe and Mary Doe, under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, as amended by several public laws codified in 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa-l to -34 (West Supp.1989).1 This matter comes before the court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation submitted in the above-captioned case by Special Master Elizabeth E. Wright, on October 26, 1989.2

This case was filed by the petitioners on February 14, 1989. Initially, the respondent,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grice v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. John Doe 21 v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Rupert ex rel. Rupert v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Perez v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. Huston v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API