Legal Opinion
John Doe 21 v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 30, 2009No. 02-0411VPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER REGARDING THE JANUARY 16, 2009 DECISION ON REMAND DENYING ENTITLEMENT.
BRADEN, Judge.
As previously discussed, this proceeding was far from what the court expects from the Office of the Special Masters. See John Doe 21 v. Sec’y of HHS, 84 Fed.Cl. 19, 20 (2008) ("John Doe 21"). Taking six years before a ease initially is brought to the court for review is inexcusable. Id. Likewise, as previously noted, in the court’s judgment, Petitioner’s counsel did not approach this case with proper attention to precedent or with the amount of diligence that the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Debra Ann Knudsen, by Her Parents and Legal Guardians, Doris P. Knudsen and Dale Knudsen v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- De Bazan v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Graves v. Secretary of Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Harshaw v. Bethany Christian ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Bishop v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- C v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.