Legal Opinion

Rattancraft of California v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 15, 1972No. A.R.D. 308; Entry Nos. 270032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nao, Judge:

This matter is before the court on application for review for tbe second time. At issue is the sufficiency of the evidence presented to establish that the imported merchandise was freely sold, or offered for sale, to all purchasers at the invoice unit values. Appraisement was made at said values plus items marked “X”, representing inland freight and shipping charges. The appraisement was deemed separable and appellants claim that under the separability rule the proof presented is sufficient.

When this case was originally before the trial court, evidence was introduced in the form of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. Gladden v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Young Ah Chor v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Bosserman v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. T. D. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Service Afloat, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Ross Glove Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API