Isert v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Held: On the facts submitted, petitioner is not entitled to a casualty or theft loss within the meaning of section 165, I.R.C. 1954.
1Opinion of the Court
C. Edward Isert v. Commissioner.
Isert v. Commissioner
Docket No. 3739-69 SC.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1971-150; 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 182; 30 T.C.M. (CCH) 653; T.C.M. (RIA) 71150;
June 23, 1971, Filed
Held: On the facts submitted, petitioner is not entitled to a casualty or theft loss within the meaning of section 165, I.R.C. 1954.
C. Edward Isert, pro se, 2442 Devine St., Columbus, S. C.Richard G. Holloway, for the respondent.
BRUCE
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
BRUCE, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for the year 1967 in the amount of $280.20.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. BrombergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Vietzke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Shelton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Maloney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. FairclothUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995