Legal Opinion
United States v. Faircloth
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided December 4, 1995No. ACM S29049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MORGAN, Judge:
Appellant pled guilty to forging the signature of the lienholder on an insurance check made out jointly to him and the Ford Motor Credit Corporation (FMCC) as a result of an automobile accident and to larceny of the total amount of the check. We specified two issues:
I. Whether appellant’s guilty plea to Charge 11 is provident in view of the lack *711of evidence of any legal prejudice to the Ford Motor Credit Corporation where the purpose of having FMCC as a joint payee on the check at issue was the protection of FMCC’s security interest in appellant’s vehicle.
II.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Thomas J. FaustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Perini Corporation and Brown Brothers, Harriman and Company, Plaintiffs v. The First National Bank of Habersham County, Georgia, the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, Georgia and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York, Perini Corporation and Brown Brothers, Harriman and Company, Plaintiffs v. The First National Bank of Habersham County, Georgia, and the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. ShavrnochUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004