Legal Opinion

Smith v. Herco, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 4, 1995No. 13-93-410-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YÁÑEZ, Justice.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion for rehearing filed in this case, we grant the motion, withdraw our prior opinion rendered March 16, 1995, and substitute the following opinion and judgment in its place.

Bruce Smith appeals from a judgment rendered in his favor. He contends that the trial court erred by not awarding him the largest sum of damages under the jury’s verdict. By cross-points, Shearer Engineering contends that the trial court erred by ordering it to indemnify the Hershey Corporation (Herco) for any sum it pays to Smith. We affirm in part, modify in part,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Kessler v. FanningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Barry v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. Otero v. Jordan Restaurant EnterprisesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Thedford v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API