Dana v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In this proceeding the judge denied leave to a committee of the debtor’s shareholders to intervene in a proceeding under Chapter X, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq., upon the authority of In re Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co., 3 Cir., 105 F.2d 358; but ordered that it should “receive notice of all matters arising in this proceeding with the right to participate therein.” Not satisfied with this, the committee appealed.
Section 77B, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, gave to “any creditor or stockholder * * * the right to be heard” only as to “the permanent appointment of * * * trustees, and * * * confirmation of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Keystone Realty Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- In Re Barclay Park CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re Day & Meyer, Murray & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- In re Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers and Reynolds Metals Company v. Middle South Energy, Inc., Arkansas Power & Light Company, Appellee-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Hofheimer v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- In Re United Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Horowitz v. Kaplan in Re Waltham Watch CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.