Legal Opinion

In re Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1939No. Nos. 7131-7134PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

In Steere v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, 3 Cir., 98 F.2d 889, and Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 3 Cir., 99 F.2d 642, this court, in accord with the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the Second and Fifth Circuits, laid down rules for the guidance of the district courts in permitting the intervention of security-holders’ committees in reorganization proceedings under Sec. 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, and treating intervention as a condition precedent to the allowance of compensation to such committees and their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. Steere v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Cowan v. Dickinson Industrial SiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marin Motor Oil, Inc. v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re United Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  3. Dana v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Matter of Duplan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API