Legal Opinion
In Re Day & Meyer, Murray & Young, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 3, 1938No. 147PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Leave to appeal was granted, and the case is properly here. Meyer v. Kenmore Granville Hotel Co., 297 U.S. 160, 56 S.Ct. 405, 80 L.Ed. 557. The appeal is from an order confirming the plan of reorganization and, although the bondholders have not formally intervened, they can be heard. In re Barclay Park Corp., 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 595.
Appellant bondholders own $19,000 out of an issue of outstanding first mortgage 6% per cent, bonds in the sum of $590,500, on which issue there are arrears in interest amounting to $173,354.98. All the assets, with the exception of current assets…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Murel Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. FlershemSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Meyer v. Kenmore Granville Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United Properties Incorporated, and Hans Bodsgard v. Emporium Department Stores, Inc., Debtor, and Its Creditors CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- In Re Radio-Keith-Orpheum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- In Re United Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.