Legal Opinion
Sheth v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 2000No. 99-271PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
A hearing examiner denied Dinesh P. Sheth's claim for worker's compensation benefits for expenses related to a myocardial infarction. Sheth appeals, claiming the hearing examiner misapplied the statute governing claims for cardiac conditions. Because we conclude the hearing examiner's decision is in accord with law and not arbitrary and capricious, we affirm.
ISSUES
Sheth presents this statement of the issues:
1. Whether the hearing examiner's decision to deny benefits for Mr. Sheth's work related heart attack is contrary to law?
2. Whether the hearing examiner's decision to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Yenne-Tully v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISIONWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Loomer v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. KaczmarekWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.