Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Lloyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1986No. B013243PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

The appellants appeal from the trial court’s grant of the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. They raise three central issues on appeal. First, did the respondent fail to pursue this matter in a timely fashion? Second, was there a triable issue of fact whether the issuance of a limited partnership interest was exempt from qualification? Third, should all of the appellants have been held liable for the transaction at issue? We conclude one of the appellants should not have been held liable. In all other respects, the decision of tfre trial court to grant the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. LutnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Hebron Public School District No. 13 of Morton County v. United States Gypsum Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Rexplore, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
  4. Eisenbaum v. Western Energy Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Stewart v. RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API