Legal Opinion
Gibson v. FILTER QUEEN COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 30, 1964No. 40678PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
1. “It is erroneous for the court to direct a verdict in favor of a particular party or parties to the cause unless there is no issue of fact, or unless the proved facts, viewed from every possible legal point, would sustain no other finding than the one so directed. Norris v. Coffee, 206 Ga. 759 (58 SE2d 812).” Horn v. Preston, 217 Ga. 165 (121 SE2d 775).
2. If a debtor remits a sum of money to his creditor, though less than the amount actually due, with the understanding, either express or implied, that it is in satisfaction of his creditor’s claim, and the latter accepts and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rivers v. Cole CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Burgamy v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Norris v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Horn v. PrestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Mortgage Purchase & Sales Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
3Cited by13 opinions
- Braswell v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Bradford v. Lindsey Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Moody v. Nides Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Studstill v. American Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. CEBM, LTD.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.