Legal Opinion
Moody v. Nides Finance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 12, 1967No. 42828PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. “It is erroneous for the court to direct a verdict in favor of a particular party or parties to the cause unless there is no issue of fact, or unless the proved facts, viewed from every possible legal point, would sustain no other finding than the one so directed. Norris v. Coffee, 206 Ga. 759 (58 SE2d 812).” Horn v. Preston, 217 Ga. 165 (121 SE2d 775); Gibson v. Filter Queen Co., 109 Ga. App. 650 (136 SE2d 922). “In giving consideration to a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the court is concerned substantially with the same principles of law as are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Haiman & Brother v. Moses & GerrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Norris v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Field v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Hudspeth Motors v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Braswell v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Wirth v. HeaveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Savings Bank of New Britain v. BoozeConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
- Bradford v. Lindsey Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Maloy v. Planter's Warehouse & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.