Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.P.H.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 2004No. 03CA2027PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
LH. (mother) appeals from the district court's order reviewing the magistrate's order modifying the allocation of parental responsibilities to S.B. (father). We reverse and remand for a new hearing on father's motion for modification.
Father filed a petition for determination of paternity in December 1997, and in March 1999 the court approved the parties' stipulation concerning paternity, custody, parenting time, and child support. The parties agreed to share joint custody of the child and designated mother as the primary residential custodian. The magistrate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. A. M. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- C.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Horton v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Water, Waste & Land, Inc. v. LanhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- In re R.G.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re R.G.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- People ex rel. M.A.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- In the Interest of K.L.O-V.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of T.E.M., T.E.M., W.B.M., Jr., T.B.M., and C.E.M., Children, Upon the Petition of Denver Department of Human Services, and Concerning W.B.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- In Re Petition of RGBColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.