Legal Opinion

Lamontagne v. Knightly

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 12, 1991No. 89-P-1306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

In 1988, the plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Land Court, claiming that the town of Methuen had failed to notify them of two land takings in 1939 and 1944 for nonpayment of taxes and of the subsequent sale of the land, thereby depriving them of due process of law and making the takings invalid. The Land Court entered a judgment for the defendants, holding that (1) the procedure followed by the town complied with the requirements of G. L. c. 60, § 79, for sale of low value land taken for nonpayment of taxes and (2) G. L. c. 60, § 80C, barred the plaintiffs’ petition. The plaintiffs appealed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Christian v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Napier v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. City of Boston v. JamesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Bartevian v. CullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hull v. Attleboro Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Town of Andover v. State Financial Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Teschke v. KellerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Town of Brewster v. Sherwood Forest Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API