Legal Opinion
Clay v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 14, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1612PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
This case is a civil action to enforce rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), as amended, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., as well as under the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. Compl. at 1. Congress enacted the IDEA “to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public Education [ (‘FAPE’) ] that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living.” Petties ex rel.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Yancey v. St. Elizabeths HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- J.B. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barber v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Blair-Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.