Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 13, 1984
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1985No. 84 CV 4756PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Petitioner, one of two partners in a consulting firm, moves to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). On March 25, 1985, this Court held that the traditional rule of Beilis v. United States, 417 U.S. 85, 94 S.Ct. 2179, 40 L.Ed.2d 678 (1974), was not an automatic bar to petitioner’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment in opposition to the subpoena. The Court left open, however, pending consideration of the act of production doctrine, whether the claim of privilege covers the particular documents sought. In re Grand Jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Frederick PraetoriusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated October 29, 1992. United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BerkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- In Re HydeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re DG Acquisition Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. HubbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.