Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated October 29, 1992. United States of America v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 21, 1993No. 1497, Docket 93-1070PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals from an order entered on January 7, 1993 in the Southern District of New York, Pollack, J., denying its motion to compel John Doe to comply with a grand jury subpoena duces tecum dated October 29, 1992. The subpoena commanded Doe to produce “[t]he original version of any diary or calendar for the year 1988, a copy of which has been produced to the SEC.” On appeal, the government argues that the court erred in denying its motion to compel because: (1) the Fifth Amendment does not protect the contents of voluntarily prepared, non-business documents…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Rajah v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Porter v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Dated April 18, 2003, John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. KimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.