Legal Opinion

Taylor v. LSI Logic Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 25, 1998No. 58, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTNETT, Justice.

In this appeal we consider whether the Court of Chancery has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim predicated upon Section 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act (“the Canadian Act”). We hold that the equitable relief sought in the complaint may be granted only in the courts of Canada as those courts are defined in Section 2 of the Canadian Act. We, therefore, affirm the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of the suit, albeit on different grounds. We disagree with the Court of Chancery that the doctrine of comity dictates dismissal of this suit and we find that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. McDowell-Wellman Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. New Jersey Automobile Club v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Martinez v. E.i. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Ison v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc. v. PaulssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Loppert v. WindsorTech, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API