Legal Opinion

JV-132324 v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 23, 1995No. 1 CA-SA 94-0301, 1 CA-SA 94-0302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Two juveniles seek special action relief from a juvenile court commissioner’s denial of their request for a change of commissioner. 1 Each juvenile’s notice of change of commissioner, filed at each juvenile’s first appearance in court at an advisory hearing, was denied by the commissioner as untimely.

Because untimeliness cannot bar the juveniles’ right to a change of commissioner unless they had the opportunity to exercise that right, we are presented with the following issue: when did the juveniles first have the opportunity to exercise their right to a change of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Medders v. ConlogueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Robinson v. HothamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. In re Jonah T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API