Legal Opinion

Medders v. Conlogue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 3, 2004No. 2 CA-SA 2004-0017PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner Darren Medders seeks special action relief from the respondent judge’s order in the underlying criminal prosecution denying Medders’s notice of peremptory change of the same judge on the ground that Medders had waived his right to do so by appearing earlier before that judge in a contested matter. As Medders has no equally plain, speedy, or adequate remedy by appeal of a denial of notice of change of judge, special action review is appropriate. See Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 1(a), 17B A.R.S.; Bergeron ex rel. Perez v. O’Neil, 205 Ariz. 640, ¶¶ 11-12, 74 P.3d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Arizona's Towing Professionals, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Edward P. Bolding v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Lopez v. KEARNEY EX REL. COUNTY OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State of Arizona v. Rock Kelly IngramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API