Legal Opinion
Gomez v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 19, 2000No. CIV. 99-3022, CR 97-30073PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
The Court having adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to vacate or set aside conviction and sentence (Doc. 104) is denied.
ORDER
Juan Gomez, plaintiff, filed a motion (Doc. 104) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. This Court referred the matter to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Moreno pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(2)(B). Judge Moreno caused to be filed on March 27, 2000, his report and recommendations for disposition (Doc. 112). Gomez was specifically warned that failure to file written…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ArcorenDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- United States v. One StarDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2008