Legal Opinion
State of New Mexico v. General Electric
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 31, 2006No. 04-2191PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
This is a case in which the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico (AG) seeks unrestricted money damages exclusively under state law for groundwater contamination in Albuquerque’s South Valley. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendants General Electric (GE) and ACF Industries (ACF) because the AG “failed to raise genuine issues of material fact on the essential elements of injury and damages.” New Mexico v. General Elec. Co., 322 F.Supp.2d 1237, 1271 (D.N.M.2004). We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm in part and dismiss in…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Young v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Fernandez-Vargas v. PfizerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Hood v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- City of Fresno v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.