Legal Opinion

Shuey v. Holmes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1902No. 3328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King ^County. — Hon. E. T>. Benson, Judge.

1Per curiam

The principal question presented by this appeal falls within the rule of the case of Shuey v Holmes, 21 Wash. 223 (57 Pac. 818), and, on the authority of that case, must he determined adversely to the contention of the appellant.

It is further urged that the court erred in overruling a motion for a new trial. This motion was based upon the several statutory grounds, the one urged here being accident and surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. After a careful examination of the record, however, we fail to find error in the ruling of the trial court. The affidavits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shuey v. HolmesWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Jacobson v. LunnWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hale v. City Cab, Carriage & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rice Fisheries Co. v. Pacific Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. YandellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API