Moffitt v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACREE, Judge:
The question presented in this appeal is whether Kentucky’s Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA” or the “Act”), codified at Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 17.500 — 17.580, is unconstitutional as applied to Appellant, Brian Moffitt, on the grounds that it violates his procedural and substantive due process rights. Because we find Kentucky’s SORA constitutionally sound, we affirm the Livingston Circuit Court’s August 27, 2010 order denying Moffitt relief.
I. Facts and Procedure
In June 2002, Moffitt was convicted of kidnapping a minor child in violation of KRS 509.040(b).3…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Samuel DaughteryKentucky Supreme Court · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Cora Ladane LymonMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- The People v. Marcus BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2023