Legal Opinion

Gulf Compress Co. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 16 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court, Shelby County.— F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. Chiee Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The bill in this ease was filed at Memphis, Tenn., to recover on four several policies of insurance executed on the plant of the complainant, located in Ar-genta, Ark. The complainant corporation is domesticated in Tennessee. A judgment was rendered in complainant’s favor on all the policies, and the defend-' ants have appealed to this court, and assigned errors, fourteen in number.

A jury was demanded, and issues were framed for their consideration in the trial court. There were seven of these. They were in the form of questions. In No.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickerson & Co. v. Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mechanics' Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  3. Standard Sewing Machine Co. v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Frick v. United Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. McCready v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  2. Benson v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  3. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  4. Stevens v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Ridings v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API