Legal Opinion

People v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover the penalty of $10 alleged to have been forfeited by the Bailway Company under section twenty-seven of the Act approved June 8, 1881, entitled “ An act to revise and consolidate the laws relating to the establishment, opening, improvement and maintenance of highways and private roads, and the building, repairing, and preservation of bridges within this State.” The section reads as follows:

“ Where any highway may have been or shall be established across any railroad, the company operating such rani-road shall open,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lancaster County v. C., B. & Q. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. HoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad v. Detroit & Bay City RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Duval Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Townsend v. Michigan Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API