Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1959No. 3644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

This personal injury case arises out of a rear-end automobile collision. Negative jury findings in answer to the following issues are assailed on the grounds there is no evidence of probative force supporting them, and that they are so contrary to the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust:

“1: Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that immediately before the collision made the basis of this suit, Sam W. Parrish was following the plaintiff’s vehicle more closely than an ordinarily prudent person, in the exercise of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Renshaw v. CountessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hoey v. SoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Caraway v. BehrendtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Moss v. KoetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parrish v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Roever v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Pederson v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Hunt v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API