Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1963No. 16395PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Appellant (plaintiff below) contends certain jury findings in a rear-end automobile collision case are contrary to the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence. These findings are to the effect that defendant did not fail to keep a proper lookout, did not drive too closely behind the vehicle in which appellant was riding, did not fail to make proper and timely application of brakes, and was not negligent with respect to the rate of speed he was driving.

Additional were findings that though defendant failed to turn and drive to the left, such was not negligence, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goolsbee v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Parrish v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hunt v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Hunt v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw Ex Rel. Shaw v. NullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Roever v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Daggett v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Schwab v. Ranger Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Walker v. BoundsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API