Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Nicastro

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 8, 1981No. 80 C 2820PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Eileen Kennedy and Frank Murphy filed this action as a claimed class action on behalf of the stockholders of Xcor International, Inc. (“Xcor”) and as a claimed derivative action on behalf of Xcor. Defendants include Xcor, The Seeburg Corporation (“Seeburg”), Consolidated Entertainment, Inc. (“Consolidated”), Xcor’s officers, directors, attorneys and accountants and a principal lender, and another alleged controlling person of Xcor, Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. (“G & W”).

This Court’s December 16,1980 memorandum opinion and order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,535 David A. Lipton and Sylvia S. Lipton v. Documation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Brown v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Anderson v. Bank of South, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1987
  4. Berent v. Kemper Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  5. Brown v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API