Legal Opinion

Waisner v. Jones

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1986No. 8064PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Plaintiff sued for unlawful repossession of her vehicle. Defendant Credit Union One counterclaimed based on default in payment of the promissory note given by plaintiff. Following a jury trial in which the hereinafter described verdict was returned, plaintiff appeals, raising eight issues. We dismiss the appeal as premature, however, because plaintiff fails to appeal from a final order.

After plaintiff filed her brief-in-chief, defendant Credit Union One moved to dismiss the appeal. Defendant claims that an order entered August 16, 1984, granting defendant’s Rule 60(b)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Albuquerque Productions Credit Ass'n v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jemez Properties, Inc. v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Plaza National Bank v. ValdezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. PothierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cowan v. PowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API