Legal Opinion
Grindstaff v. Oaks Owners' Ass'n
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 25, 2016No. Case No. 112,671PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DEBORAH B. BARNES, JUDGE:
¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Michael and Debbie Grindstaff (Homeowners) sustained damage to their property as a result of water eroding the bank of a creek behind their home. Homeowners asserted several theories—including negligence and breach of contract—against their neighborhood homeowners association, Defendant/Appellee Oaks Owners’ Association, Inc. (HOA). Homeowners appeal the Order in which the trial court, following a three-day nonjury trial, found the damage “was due to erosion,” and “rule[d] that the June 2010 storm was an act of God and/or force…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Wofford v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- BLUFF CREEK TOWNHOMES ASSOC., INC. v. HAMMONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
- TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- Venver SA v. GEFCO IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023