Matcha v. Wachs
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
This declaratory action arose out of a dispute regarding priority between two sets of would-be redemptioners from a mortgage foreclosure sale. The appellees, Michael and Janet Matcha, brought suit against the Maricopa County Sheriff and Wachs and the other appellants (hereinafter referred to as Wachs) seeking a declaratory judgment that they and not Wachs were entitled to redeem the property sold at the foreclosure sale. The trial court found that Wachs had not perfected his right to re*379deem and entered summary judgment in favor of Matcha. Wachs appealed. On appeal, the court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salsbery v. RitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie United States of America v. Engine Service Co., Inc., an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Hruby v. SteinmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- United States v. LoosleyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Dupnik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- GESA Federal Credit Union v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Grazer v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Millay v. CamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.