Legal Opinion
Dupnik v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1988No. 87-1774PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the issue whether the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) must comply with an Arizona statute that requires lien creditors who wish to redeem property sold at foreclosure to file a notice of intent to redeem within six months of the foreclosure sale. See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 12-1284 (1982).1 It is undisputed that the applicable federal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2410, gives the government a right to redeem within one year of a foreclosure sale. Arizona law, however, voids redemption rights which are not preserved by a notice of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gaylon L. Harrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- American International Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Great Southwest Life Insurance Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Whitehead v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.