People v. Tyburski
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
The issue presented in this highly publicized murder case is whether defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the manner in which the trial judge conducted voir dire. Because the trial court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a sufficiently probing voir dire in order to uncover potential juror bias, and that, therefore, defendant was denied a fair trial, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for a new trial.
i
The Court of Appeals opinion sufficiently summarizes the underlying facts surrounding the murder.
Following a jury trial, defendant was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. OrlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Warren English v. Mary BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- People v. JendrzejewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.