Legal Opinion

People v. Tyburski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1994No. 95719, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

The issue presented in this highly publicized murder case is whether defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the manner in which the trial judge conducted voir dire. Because the trial court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a sufficiently probing voir dire in order to uncover potential juror bias, and that, therefore, defendant was denied a fair trial, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for a new trial.

i

The Court of Appeals opinion sufficiently summarizes the underlying facts surrounding the murder.

Following a jury trial, defendant was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. OrlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Warren English v. Mary BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. People v. JendrzejewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API