Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance v. 21 Mott Street Restaurant Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank Composto, J.
The plaintiff insurance company instituted this proceeding for a declaratory judgment. The action is to declare that the plaintiff is under no obligation under a general liability policy to defend an assault action against the named defendants, or to pay any judgment that may be obtained by one Michael Knigin against the defendants herein. The Knigin action *428against the assureds is presently pending in the Supreme Court, New York County.
At the hearing, the plaintiff submitted for the court’s consideration, the original insurance policy. It draws the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Commercial Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- C. O. Falter, Inc. v. Crum & Forster InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Nallan v. Union Labor Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Agoado Realty Corp. v. United International InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- County of Monroe v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Town of Clifton Park v. Home InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1987