Legal Opinion
Nassau Insurance v. Mel Jo-Jo Cab Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
In this action the plaintiff, Nassau Insurance Company (hereinafter Nassau) seeks a judgment declaring that its attorney may withdraw his appearance as counsel for Mel Jo-Jo Cab Corp. (hereinafter Cab Corp.) and that Nassau is not obligated under the policy of insurance issued to defendant Cab Corp., the named insured, to provide a defense or indemnification of Cab Corp. and/or defendant David L. Knight in the action instituted against said defendants by Joyce Cohen. A nonjury trial was held before this court on September 18, 1979.
Defendant Cab Corp.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Morgan v. Greater New York Taxpayers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American States Insurance Company v. Alexis BorborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. BrooksHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- Roe v. LAWN AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.