Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 2015No. COA14–1093Published

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

Defendants Michael Hawkins and Green Techniques, LLC, appeal from the trial court's order denying their motions, made shortly before trial, to amend their pleadings to assert new counterclaims. Defendants acknowledge that their appeal is interlocutory but contend that their new claims are compulsory under Rule 13 and therefore the denial of their motion is immediately appealable under this Court's precedent.

To be compulsory under Rule 13, a counterclaim must exist at the time of the initial pleading; new claims that arise during litigation are not compulsory. Here, Defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Carter v. Rockingham County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Driggers v. Commercial Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Holloway v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API