Haynes v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Barnwell, May 30, 1895. Action by B. F. Haynes against Joseph B. Hoffman, John S. C. Hoffman, and M. E. Izlar, as assignee of Joseph B. Hoffman, to set aside a deed of assignment and a mortgage as a fraud against creditors, for the appointment of a receiver, for injunction, and for judgment on a note, commenced February, 1895. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Chibe Justice McIver.
Inasmuch as it is stated in the “Case,” as prepared for argument here, that the hearing below “was upon the pleadings and affidavits, plaintiff admitting the truth of the allegations of the answers of John S. C. Hoffman and Joseph B. Hoffman, and the statements made in the affidavits of Joseph B. Hoffman and M. E. Izlar,” it will be necessary, for a proper understanding of the case, to set forth, substantially, the allegations and statements appearing in those papers, as found in the “Case.” The first, second, third, and fourth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morehead Banking Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Bobbitt v. . RodwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Davis v. B. J. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Eigenbrun v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Rouse v. . BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harold J. Abrams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Englander v. McKesson-roeber-kuebler Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936